In the quote from Gawande’s book, BEING MORTAL,
that I posted last week, I included the paragraph below. Quite simply and succinctly Gawande addresses
two major issues: purpose and meaning in
later life and “activities” as experienced in most nursing homes to this day.
“There was so much
more she felt she could do in her life. ‘I want to be helpful, play a role,’
she said. She used to make her own jewelry, volunteer at the library. Now her
main activities were bingo, DVD movies, and other forms of passive group
entertainment. The things she missed most, she told me, were her friendships,
privacy, and a purpose to her days.
Nursing homes have come a long way from the firetrap warehouses of
neglect they used to be. But it seems we’ve succumbed to a belief that once you
lose your physical independence, a life of worth and freedom is simply not
possible.”
The challenge is presented: how do we transform that aspect of nursing
home culture which defines “activities” as what are really primarily generic
activities, not related to personal interests (Bingo and DVD movies), and “forms
of passive group entertainment.” Carter
Williams, social worker, advocate and activist, noted in her convening address
to the Pioneer Network Conference in 2013 that “life is more than activities.
It is engagement.”
A few years ago I visited Perham Living, a nursing
home in Perham, MN, an onsite visit during the Pioneer Network Conference. An
outstanding memory of that visit some seven years ago is of a woman who was
growing African Violets in her room. It was something she had done for years.
There were quite a number of these beautiful plants. We were told that the
workmen had installed a deep wooden shelf near the window, as she had
requested. It allowed this woman to engage in life, to continue familiar
routines that were meaningful and pleasurable. This nurturer of violets was in her late nineties at this time.
There is
a breadth and depth of implications and consequences for moving beyond
activities to engagement. Federal Regulations called the Minimum Standards
(yes, minimum) mandate that nursing
homes learn what specific interests each resident has and to build “activities”
around those interests. The tragic
reality is that even with these standards in place, surveyors by and large
ignore the spirit and meaning of the minimum standards for “Activities”.
There
are, of course, implications of cost and of outcomes for the transformation of
activities that are generic and/or passive group entertainment. In the case of the woman with her violets,
research indicates such involvement enhances emotional and mental health. The
sense of well-being can heighten one’s immune system, in contrast to a state of
depression, isolation and loneliness all too common in too many nursing homes.
Theoretically, then, this woman raising her African Violets was less likely to
contract diseases that cannot be fought with a weakened immune system. She was also
delivered from the insidious prescription of anti-depressants. In all of this, no expense item has been noted,
only the avoidance of possible expensive medications with an accompanying
lowered quality of life.
The cost
to the nursing home for this intervention, this facilitating quality of life,
purpose and meaning? The board to hold
the plants. And maybe an hour’s labor from an employee in the maintenance
department.
What if
the interests, routines, and preferences of each resident in an Assisted Living
or in a nursing home community were known, really known by the staff? Would there be engagement? Would we find that
the word “Activities” does not describe what is happening as residents
engage? I believe it would. We are
moving to that reality when we describe the person responsible for this
engagement as a Life Enrichment Director rather than an Activities Director.
No comments:
Post a Comment